Superhuman

Grooming can refer to12345:

• Cleaning and maintaining the appearance of an animal, especially by brushing, combing, currying, or similar attention1.
• Making neat or attractive1.
• The way an abuser gradually works toward gaining a vulnerable person’s trust and affection so they can manipulate and exploit them later2.
• The things that you do to make your appearance clean and neat, for example brushing your hair, or the things that you do to keep an animal's hair or fur clean and neat3.
• Any behavior that a perpetrator uses to prepare a vulnerable person to be the victim of abuse4. not all grooming is bad plus if it was than you'd be in jail for brushing your hair.

and look up what grooming is dumbass.

oh, wow posting more false bullshit and claiming people are abusing and grooming kids with no proof still and saying his own words are false. so, you saying you want to bang dogs never happened even through you posted a picture of it?

dude my mental health is fine it seems yours is messed up through since your running because you can't take the truth.

speaking of i got to go check my notifications really quick.

and when did i start stuff? i asked a question and you called me a pedophile. but keep spreading lies.

so, your fat? plus, the guy in the photo is fat and has a small dick and small arms. nah i wont travel to a country that could be bombed any second because they have no laws.

 and i have provided a photo you just said that it wasn't illegal to fuck a dog when i posted it dumbass. and any proof I've molested anyone or that I'm josh? cause i can actually take you to court for that.

well, you covered his name so i can't tell you who dumbass. and you've still provided no proof I'm josh. and why would i take hours out of my time to post something you will just say isn't illegal.

i have provided proof you're a rapist dumbass you just think raping animals isn't illegal or zoophile shit. and Ima post the definition of backpedaling since your so dumb you can't read. and bestiality is illegal content dumbass.  

move the pedals of a bicycle backward (formerly to brake).

• reverse one's previous action or opinion: "you've criticized him for backpedaling on budget reform" Similar:change one's mind row back shift one's ground
• move hastily backward: "backpedaling furiously, he flipped a perfect pass

yes, it does support my argument plus you have tried to add illegal content plus just because you think bestially isn't illegal doesn't mean it's not illegal. and when did you prove me wrong? you posted another blurry ass photo like last time that showed there's 2 Bureaucrats and still haven't proven I'm josh.

and again, what evidence? cause I've proven you're a zoophile and rapist. and again, learn what backpedaling means. heres the definiton idiot.

move the pedals of a bicycle backward (formerly to brake).

• reverse one's previous action or opinion: "you've criticized him for backpedaling on budget reform" Similar:change one's mind row back shift one's ground
• move hastily backward: "backpedaling furiously, he flipped a perfect pass. and who's everyone becaus i haven't seen anyone defending your zoophile ass.

and heres the tos which states no illegal content which you're trying to get added.

A terms of service agreement is mainly used for legal purposes by companies which provide software or services, such as web browsers, e-commerce, web search engines, social media, and transport services.

A legitimate terms of service agreement is legally binding and may be subject to change.^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-Terms_of_service_Definition_from_PC_Magazine_Encyclopedia-2" ]<2]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-Terms_of_service_Definition_from_PC_Magazine_Encyclopedia-2" ]<2]<="" a=""> Companies can enforce the terms by refusing service. Customers can enforce by filing a lawsuit or </a>arbitration case if they can show they were actually harmed by a breach of the terms. There is a heightened risk of data going astray during corporate changes, including mergers, divestitures, buyouts, downsizing, etc., when data can be transferred improperly.^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-legaltech-3" ]<3]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-legaltech-3" ]<3]<="" a=""> </a>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-legaltech-3" ]<3]<="" a="">Content[</a>edit]

A terms of service agreement typically contains sections pertaining to one or more of the following topic:

• Disambiguation/definition of keywords and phrases
• User rights and responsibilities
  • Proper or expected usage; definition of misuse
  • Accountability for online actions, behavior, and conduct
  • Privacy policy outlining the use of personal data
  • Payment details such as membership or subscription fees, etc.
  • Opt-out policy describing procedure for account termination, if available
  • Sometimes contains an Arbitration clause detailing the dispute resolution process and limited rights to take a claim to court
• Disclaimer/Limitation of liability, clarifying the site's legal liability for damages incurred by users
• User notification upon modification of terms, if offered

Among 102 companies marketing genetic testing to consumers in 2014 for health purposes, 71 had publicly available terms and conditions:^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a=""> </a>

• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a="">57 of the 71 had disclaimer clauses (including 10 disclaiming liability for injury caused by their own negligence) </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a="">51 let the company change terms (including 17 without notice) </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a="">34 allow data disclosure in certain circumstances </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-phillips-4" ]<4]<="" a="">31 require consumers to </a>indemnify the company
• 20 promise not to sell data

Among 260 mass market consumer software license agreements in 2010:^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a=""> </a>

• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">91% disclaimed warranties of merchantability or fitness for purpose or said it was "As is" </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">92% disclaimed consequential, incidental, special or foreseeable damages </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">69% did not warrant the software was free of defects or would work as described in the manual </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">55% capped damages at the purchase price or less </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">36% said they were not warranting whether it infringed others' intellectual property rights </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">32% required arbitration or a specific court </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">17% required the customer to pay legal bills of the maker (indemnification), but not vice versa </a>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-w2010-5" ]<5]<="" a="">Among the terms and conditions of 31 </a>cloud-computing services in January-July 2010, operating in England:^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a=""> </a>

• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">27 specified the law to be used (a US state or other country) </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">most specify that consumers can claim against the company only in a particular city in that jurisdiction, though often the company can claim against the consumer anywhere </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">some require claims to be brought within half a year to 2 years </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">7 impose arbitration, all forbid illegal and objectionable conduct by the consumer </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">13 can amend terms just by posting changes on their own website </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">a majority disclaim responsibility for confidentiality or backups </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">most promise to preserve data only briefly after terminating service </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">few promise to delete data thoroughly when the customer leaves </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">some monitor the customers' data to enforce their policies on use </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">all disclaim warranties and almost all disclaim liability </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service#cite_note-qmul2-6" ]<6]<="" a="">24 require the customer to </a>indemnify them, a few indemnify the customer
• a few give credits for poor service, 15 promise "best efforts" and can suspend or stop at any time

• Add the user groups: administrator, bureaucrat, interface administrator, account creator, bot, copyright violation bot, confirmed user, and pending changes reviewer.^{<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#cite_note-1" ]<1]<="" a=""></a>}<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#cite_note-1" ]<1]<="" a=""> </a>
• <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#cite_note-1" ]<1]<="" a="">Remove the user groups: administrator, interface administrator, account creator, bot, copyright violation bot, </a>IP block exempt, confirmed user, and pending changes reviewer.

Some of the above abilities overlap with administrators who are able to add and remove the IP block exempt, confirmed user, and pending changes user groups (in addition to certain other user groups).

Bureaucrats are bound by policy and consensus to only grant administrator or bureaucrat access when doing so reflects the wishes of the community, usually after a successful request at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. In the same fashion, they are expected to exercise judgement in granting or removing bot flags with the advice of the Bot Approvals Group. They are expected to be capable judges of consensus, and are expected to explain the reasoning for their actions on request and in a civil manner. Actions by bureaucrats are also bound by the policy on use of administrative rights.

Bureaucrats have been authorized by the community to remove administrator permissions in certain situations outlined below. Bureaucrats do not have the technical ability to remove bureaucrat rights from users or to grant or remove certain levels of access such as oversight or checkuser rights. These actions are performed by stewards, a multilingual group of individuals who serve all Wikimedia projects and are elected and reconfirmed annually by their users. Changes in user rights by stewards are recorded at meta:Special:Log/rights; for more information, see m:Steward requests/Permissions.

Users are granted bureaucrat status by community consensus. The process is similar to the process of granting administrator status, but the expectations for potential bureaucrats are higher and community consensus must be clearer. See Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship.

ok ill post the definition of the role again since you don't know it. and no i didn't backpaddle ill post the definition of that too zoophile dumbass.